Looking at how the recent elections went for Labour, it seems more and more plausible that the end of Khan’s reign is near. The London ULEZ expansion has been framed by some as an attack on London’s car owners. The High Court’s ruling allows the planned expansion of London’s ULEZ to go ahead on August 29, despite challenges from five Conservative-led councils.

Proponents argue that the London ULEZ expansion is vital for reducing pollution in London, while critics view it as part of Khan’s anti-car crusade, negatively impacting commuters and small business owners. His controversial London ULEZ policies have not been without opposition, and the recent legal challenges, although unsuccessful, highlight the deep divisions his policies have created.

The growing dissatisfaction with Labour’s green crusade, combined with the party’s underperformance in the elections, may well lead to a shift in direction. If the whispers from Labour HQ are to be believed, the days of Khan’s aggressive anti-car stance might be numbered. Many Londoners are feeling the pinch of increased costs and restrictions due to the London ULEZ expansion and Net Zero goals.

In a city as complex and multifaceted as London, the ULEZ issue represents a microcosm of the challenges facing modern urban governance. Khan’s approach has been bold and uncompromising, but it has also sparked resistance. Whether the London ULEZ expansion goes ahead as planned or is rejected by voters remains to be seen.

What must not be lost is the realization that London’s ULEZ debate is far from over, and its resolution will have lasting implications for the city’s future. The London ULEZ expansion, while aimed at reducing emissions, has ignited a debate that transcends environmental considerations. It’s a symbol of the obsessive aim of net zero by 2050. The rumblings from Labour HQ, coupled with the strong public sentiment on both sides of the London ULEZ issue, indicate that the road ahead is anything but clear. The decisions made now will not be the last in this saga for control at the expense of the average Londoner.